I’m not sure how I would categorize myself when it comes to being a Star Trek fan. I watched all of the Original Series, and admittedly I’m not as huge a fan of it as I am with Next Generation and DS9. I can’t recite plots for you, I don’t own any of the books with the schematics for how the Enterprise works. But I know the basic rules of the series. I know enough of the important things that hold it together. Simple rules like the Prime Directive. Or you can’t beam to the surface when shields are up. When it comes to the Original Series, most of my knowledge about it comes from the first 6 Star Trek features, but I know the characters well enough to understand who they are and what their history is. When I first saw the Wrath of Khan in 2004, I hadn’t watched all of the original series at that point, but I understood the meaning behind Spock’s death. I understood that Kirk, Spock, and McCoy had a history that they shared together, over three seasons of televisions and two feature films. There was also no guarantee at that point that Spock would ever come back. Even though I knew there was a movie after The Wrath of Khan called The Search For Spock, I was still emotionally caught up in Spock’s death, and the movie was so well written as to make Kirk finally stare death in the face for the first time. Even if you had no connection to Star Trek at all, you could understand the story well enough to let Spocks death have some sort of impact on you. It’s that well written. Everything about that story had built up to that moment, and it was just as beautiful, wonderful and as sad as any other pinnacle moment in motion picture history.
It seems almost idiotic and unbelievably stupid that anyone would try to redo that famous moment in film, but that’s what Star Into Darkness tries to do. From the moment John Harrison is revealed to be Khan, I had a feeling the movie was getting itself into serious trouble. This is like retelling the story of the Wrath of Khan from the perspective of Back To The Future 2, seeing the events unfold from another side. But instead of being worked into the structure of good storytelling, it’s about nothing more than serving the fans of the original movie. It takes advantage of the audiences naivety when it comes to storytelling by letting their emotions from another film influence them instead of the story we’re watching being able to hold its own. The film also couldn’t let go of holding hands with the original series and walk on its own once Leonard Nimoy made a useless cameo appearance. Elder Spock should have been smarter and not told anything about what happened in his timeline, because all he did was allow young Spocks emotions to get caught up about Kirk in a timeline that has nothing to do with him. Elder Spock should have known this and not said anything. But the moment has nothing to do with plot. It’s all about giving fans another reappearance from Spock. It just goes to show how unwilling J.J. Abrams is willing to detach himself from the Original series, and from that point on the movie falls into disaster. The moment I saw that Kirk was going in to save the warp drive of the failing ship, I knew what they were doing and what was coming. I let out an audible “Jesus Christ” starring in disbelief that the film had completely lost its own sense of meaning and purpose to itself. It couldn’t allow itself to be it’s own thing. It had to take the easy path, keeping fans of the show unaware that there was no real story here to begin with.. For one thing, the fact that John Harrison is Khan, to Kirk and crew that doesn’t mean squat. They don’t know who he is. There is no relationship between them yet. As of this moment, there even still isn’t enough of a relationship between Kirk and Spock for Spock to shed any tears over Kirk’s “death”. On an emotional level, the scene makes absolutely no sense. The people who are getting caught up in the scene emotionally are getting caught up in their emotions from the Original Series. J.J. Abrams is letting somebody else’s movie drive his film. In the two Star Trek films Abrams has directed so far, I don’t see how Kirk and Spock could have established any sort of real relationship to make Spock shed tears over his death. Spocks emotions are based on what Elder Spock told him about the other timeline. To follow such emotions from somebody elses timeline is…er…illogical.
In fact, I think the new series has failed to establish the primary relationship that does matter: the trio of Kirk, Spock, and McCoy. It’s these three men who are at the heart of Star Trek. The new films so far have failed to build up their relationship together. McCoy is rarely there when the three of them are a group. As far as the two main characters go, Kirk spends more time cutting off Spock any time he has something important to say. It made more sense from the first film when the two men were at odds with one another. I still haven’t seen them go through enough for their relationship to mean anything.
First, the opening sequence makes no logical sense. It’s pure action drivel with very little development put on the characters. It’s not just the fact that Kirk revealed the starship to a race of primitive aliens, the entire mission is a violation of the prime directive. If the volcano is going to wipe out their civilization, then the Federation can’t interfere with the evolution of the planet or the destruction of a species. Kirk from the series was known for violating the Prime Directive, but at least his reasons made sense, and he wasn’t about to start impacting an entire ecosystem. Second…why was the ship underwater again? I couldn’t understand why they couldn’t keep the ship in space, except for the reason to have a “hey wouldn’t it be cool to see the Enterprise burst out of the ocean” moment. Third…why could they not beam Spock through water? In The Wrath of Khan, they could beam through the center of planet. In Star Trek TNG, there were cities on Earth built underwater where people could be beamed in and out. If they can beam through rock, why should beaming through water be any different?
The next thing that happened bugged me even more. The story presents a plot issue that Kirk has his command taken away from him, which we think is going to be a driving story point. After making a big mistake, Kirk has to prove himself to regain command of the Enterprise. But all it takes is the death of Captain Pike in the next scene before Kirk is given his ship back. So any sense of drama that might have related to Kirk losing the captains chair and fighting his way back to it are completely extinguished. I also can’t relate to Kirk feeling emotionally lost about losing the Captains chair because quite frankly he deserves it. And he just turns into a whimpering baby over it. Also, as far as Khan killing Captain Pike goes, I just don’t think there’s enough of relationship between Kirk and Pike to justify Kirk’s need for revenge. We have to be reminded of Pike giving command to Kirk in the first place from the first film, taking him under his wing and acting like a surrogate father to him. But it’s not enough to drive an entire emotional arc of a film. I sometimes think Kirk has the emotional stability of a high school kid, and one would think they would put a person with some ounce of maturity in the Captain’s chair. It made a little more sense in the first film, which established Kirk as being somewhat of a prodigy, even if he was unruly. But with his maturity level here, he seems undeserving of command, and I wish the film had spent more time forcing him to see this side of himself instead of instantly giving him back the Enterprise.
And then there’s the completely messed up logic in the build up to Kirk’s death, which is the Wrath of Khan moment in the story. The Enterprise is falling out of orbit and Kirk has to realign the warp core to power the main thrusters. Umm…I don’t read Enterprise technical manuals, but I know that’s not how the Enterprise works. The warp core powers the warp drive. NOT the Thrusters. That’s why in any Star Trek series, when the warp core gets knocked offline, the ship can still run on impulse (i.e. THRUSTERS). It’s one of these imbecilic design flaws where all the ships power is connected to one circuit breaker. It worked in Wrath of Khan because Spock had to fix the Warp Drive and send the ship into warp to get away from the Genesis explosion. As far as Spock screaming Khan and turning into the Vulcan terminator, they try to turn Spock into a badass, but without any of the buildup to it. It made me think like they were trying to do an Iron Giant moment, like when the Giant loses himself and turns into a killing machine. We don’t see Spock struggling to control his emotions except for getting into whiny high school banter with his girlfriend Uhura. The fight presumably being that Spock showed no feeling towards Uhura about how she would feel if the Enterprise would have left him to die in the volcano. Umm…Uhura…that’s part of service in a military operation when it comes to giving your life for service. If she’s that emotionally impaired, what is she doing in a military operation like Starfleet? It just tells me even more that this crew is not ready to be piloting starships around the galaxy.
And about Carol Marcus, another layover from Wrath of Khan…she serves absolutely no purpose to the film. She could be taken out of the film and have almost no effect on the outcome of the story. She’s that forgettable. Also, why is her father piloting a starship bigger than the Enterprise? The Enterprise is supposed to be the most advanced ship in Starfleet. Why is there a ship out there that looks like a Star Destroyer?
Once again we have another summer film that builds on everything that was familiar and had come before. This film gives more power to The Wrath of Khan than it does to itself. I think this is by far the worst Star Trek film ever made, because it never allows itself to be it’s own thing. It goes against the promise of the first Star Trek that we would see the crew go on new adventures, and I thought the very idea of separating itself by having the characters in a separate timeline was done so it would NOT INSULT the fans of the original series or Star Trek in general. For people who say they still prefer this film over Star Trek V: The Final Frontier, I say this…as bad as that film was, at least it was an original story and at least it had the guts to be its own thing. This film never follows through on any of it’s consequences. Unlike Wrath of Khan, we know Kirk isn’t going to die, and that by the end of the film he’ll be back. And also, what the hell was that moment where we hear Khan crushing Scotty’s head…and then a few minutes later when they transport back Scotty is fine? I thought they were implying Khan had killed Scotty. The rest of the crew as well just doesn’t have any solid, memorable moments like they did in the first film. There are absolutely no serious stakes or consequences that are followed through. Khan is nowhere near the murderer he was in Wrath of Khan. In that film, he killed and slaughtered everyone in the orbiting science station. Also, the fact that Kirk has a brief alliance with Khan doesn’t do anything to build up the hero/villain relationship. They are not mortal enemies yet. They don’t know what either person is capable of. Everything about this film gives more power to The Wrath of Khan than it does to itself, and it denies us any chance of getting invested in this new crew and their mission. I don’t think I have any reason to continue watching the next Star Trek. J.J. Abrams and his team of writers have no understanding or willingness to make their own mark on the Star Trek universe, or allow themselves to take chances and mark their own course in the series. If he can’t let himself go there with Star Trek, what makes anyone think he’s going to make a difference with Star Wars?